Thursday, January 12, 2006

Holy Grail Guns

Every gunny has a gun they hope to someday find at a price they can afford. For some, it may be a plastic fantastic, for others vintage iron. For me, it was a Whitney Wolverine. I could have found one on Gunbroker, but not at a price I was willing to pay after shipping and fees. Recently, I found that Holy Grail gun, and it was even at an affordable price.

After finding the Wolverine, I had to establish the next Holy Grail for Xavier. That gun will be a K-22. Not just any K-22 though, it must be pinned and recessed. Five screws. The K-22 Outdoorsman will likely be the one. I will require it in a shape that's a bit rough, so I can afford the price on the tag. I'm setting my K22 limit at $350.
There are probably many who say that cannot be done. I disagree. It might not be through normal channels, but I plan to legally acquire a K-22 for under $350.

Some may scoff at my price limitation. That's OK. Hell, any monkey can decide they want a K-22 and go surfing Gunbroker with an unlimited expense account. That's not gun hunting, that's netting fish in a barrel. I liken the entire gun acquisition experience to a fishing trip. Before you leave, you look at the sky, check the barometer, and sniff the air. You try not to carry a bunch of unnecessary crap, but you take what you need. Yes, I believe there is a K-22 out there for under $350, possibly for under $250. I might have to accept a lesser condition, or find a seller who simply no longer wants the gun around. It is out there though. I can feel it.

I will prowl the gunshows and haunt the pawnshops until I find a K-22 for under $350. I will ask people at the barber shop if they have one for sale. I will ask little old ladies at church what they might have on a closet shelf. If you know of such a gun for sale near me, you had better buy it if you want it. It's on my list, and it will be found!

I have one other Holy Grail gun. I'm in the market for an authentic, genuine WWI 1911. Again, I could quickly find a nice one on Gunbroker if I had unlimited funding. The thing is, I want to acquire this 1911 in a certain way. I want to meet and know the man who carried it. Time is running out for this acquisition, obviously. I may have to acquire it from his son or daughter.

For this pistol though, the link to the man who carried it is as important as the gun itself. I do not care if it is weathered and rusted from years of improper storage and a trip overseas for the Big One. I just want it to be a real 1911 (not a 1911A1) and to have a provenance that is known. If possible, I want to know the man who carried it, and then acquired it from the Department of War when he returned home. If not, I want to hear a few stories about him from his children. I have faith that this gun, as well, will appear.

13 comments:

  1. Anonymous5:47 AM

    i noticed you have a high standard m101. any comments it? sorry to get off topic.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8:27 AM

    Some of us are lucky enough to inherit our dream pieces:

    My WWI 1911

    The K22 is a VERY worthy aim. I found a Model 17-4 in extremely good condition for my Buy A Gun Day gun last year.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Now that's getting specific! I hope that someday my gun collection gets to the point that I have to think abit about which one I want next. I could name at least a dozen.

    Good Luck!

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous1:21 PM

    Xavier:

    Could you please enlighten me as to what makes the K-22 so special? All I see - in my ignorance, no doubt - is a terribly overpriced .22 revolver.

    ReplyDelete
  6. "All I see - in my ignorance, no doubt - is a terribly overpriced .22 revolver."

    If I may be so bold, the 5-screw, pre-'57 K-22 isn't a .22 revolver; it's the .22 revolver. It's built to a level of craftsmanship and painstaking attention to detail that are unavailable to day on any gun that costs less than $1000.

    ReplyDelete
  7. "the 5-screw, pre-'57 K-22 isn't a .22 revolver; it's the .22 revolver. It's built to a level of craftsmanship and painstaking attention to detail that are unavailable to day on any gun that costs less than $1000"
    Tam can be so bold anytime! The only thing that I could add is that it performs like a well built Smith, has the feel of a well built Smith, retains value like a well built Smith, yet affords it's owner very cheap practice. This allows him/her to really build the trigger control that makes for exceptional DA revolver shooting, without the high cost of other calibers. Just because a gun shoots .22 doesn't mean it cannot be extremely accurate, or will be made cheaply. If you want a great .22 revolver a K-22 is worth the money. for me though, the pristine finish is not, thus my price limit.

    ReplyDelete
  8. While back I bought a Enfield .38S&W revolver from a gentleman who'd been a doctor in the CIB Theatre in WWII. Traded a Brit officer a carton of cigarettes for it!

    Got to hear some nice stories from him, and got the pleasure of working up a load. Found a Lyman mold for a 190gr. roundnose bullet and can pretty much duplicate the original military load for it. And it shoots niiiice.

    Yeah, there's something about a piece with a history behind it.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous6:09 PM

    yeah, a K22 is worth it.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous11:08 AM

    I enjoyed this piece except, please don't spread this word far and wide. I'm looking for an inexpensive k-22 myself. One I'm not afraid to shoot. I'm saving my other two for my grandsons. Good blog.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous11:03 PM

    Just Bought a pristine K-22 built in 1947. Bore is bright and beautiful, and there is no wear on the deep blue finish. Paid $395 to a private owner.

    From a rest with target grade ammo (with optical sight due to my 62-year old eyes) I was able to group into .625" at 25 yards and .875" at 50 yards. With the Camp Perry bulls-eye being 3.36" this will be a most competitive handgun.

    In my opinion, there is no finer .22 ever made. There are more expensive, but after a certain level of accuracy you are paying only for snob appeal. This gun is fully capable of winning any competition. I, however, am not. but I'll enjoy it anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous6:45 PM

    I found your website while looking for info on the S&W "K-22" and companion "K-38" revolvers. I've owned a K-22 since I was a young plinker. I recall that my dad bought it for me from a co-worker, perhaps around the early 1960's. I shot it mostly in those dry periods when I didn't have access to plentiful free ammunition. Nice weapon, but in those days I couldn't hit a bull in the butt if I had him by the tail using double action. But since then I've learned to shoot DA. A year ago I found myself as the middleman in an estate sale of firearms and when my buyer backed out I suddenly became the proud owner of a matching .38 SPL target pistol. Lovely pistol ! The ultra smooth trigger pull reminds me of the Colt Officers' Match Model .38 I was issued (albeit briefly) back in the early 1970's.

    So now to my question: can you help me identify the vintage of the two magnificent pistols from the model & serial numbers? The .22 cal is marked

    K381xxx
    MOD-17

    and the .38 special is marked

    5K39xxx
    MOD
    14-4

    The .38 has a gorgeous wide hammer & wide trigger. The .22 sadly has neither. Aside from that they are peas in a pod.

    Any help I.D.ing them would be greatly appreciated.

    Ed

    ReplyDelete
  13. K381xxx
    MOD-17 1959


    5K39xxx
    MOD-14-4 1972 This one is odd. The dash 4 modificationss came in 1977.

    ReplyDelete

I reserve the right to not publish ignorant ill-informed and filthy comments from vile cretins who have a four letter vocabulary. Further, anonymous comments with strong opinions and personal attacks may be rejected. If you want to voice a strong opinion, at least have the courage to sign your name to it. You don't even have to use your name, make something up so the next person can address your comment without confusion.