Tam shows why it's handy to know what the hell you are talking about before you start saying someone is a fraud. Yeah, it was probably a distinction overheard on CSI, but still, if you are debunking, it's best to know the facts yourself.
Wednesday, July 25, 2007
What's This?
Tam shows why it's handy to know what the hell you are talking about before you start saying someone is a fraud. Yeah, it was probably a distinction overheard on CSI, but still, if you are debunking, it's best to know the facts yourself.
5 comments:
I reserve the right to not publish ignorant ill-informed and filthy comments from vile cretins who have a four letter vocabulary. Further, anonymous comments with strong opinions and personal attacks may be rejected. If you want to voice a strong opinion, at least have the courage to sign your name to it. You don't even have to use your name, make something up so the next person can address your comment without confusion.
You might already know this, Xav, but Bryan Preston's by and large a shill for gun-grabber Rudy Giuliani. I think it's safe to say that he doesn't really care about any kind of gun-related issue unless he can use it as a cudgel with which to beat a Democrat...but curiously enough, GOP gun-grabbers seem to get a pass...
ReplyDeleteThis is an example of premature unlocking of a semi-auto pistol. The firing pin did not have time to retract and marked the primer with the elongated impression shown.
ReplyDeletethe case on the left was fired in a Glock, the one on the right possibly a SigSauer
ReplyDeleteA bit of primer wipe is normal in both those guns, a Glock 33 and a Beretta 96.
ReplyDeleteThe "square back" comment is just one of many things in the origional TNR story that caused the blogosphere to start asking questions. Based on TNR's decision to sack "Gracie" today it seems that more questions need to be asked.
ReplyDelete