Sunday, April 26, 2009
9 comments:
I reserve the right to not publish ignorant ill-informed and filthy comments from vile cretins who have a four letter vocabulary. Further, anonymous comments with strong opinions and personal attacks may be rejected. If you want to voice a strong opinion, at least have the courage to sign your name to it. You don't even have to use your name, make something up so the next person can address your comment without confusion.
What a SIG.
ReplyDeleteThis is an ugly gun, but on the other hand, I have seen worse. I have an American Rifleman from 1952 or so, advertising S & W revolvers in pastel colors-anodized aluminum. The current incarnation of Charter Arms offers pink and turquoise color revolvers. Who buys these things? Someone must, or else they would not be offered.
Remember good taste and "tacti-cool" are not a requirement for excercise of the Second Amendment right.
Has anyone out there actually carried or used a gun in such garish and tacky dress? Enquiring minds want to know.
GKT
My girlfriend said "That's Pretty!"
ReplyDelete... 'nuff said.
Mein Gott! As Tam might say..."Yes, I know it's a SIG, but what have you DONE to it?"
ReplyDeleteOh geez... I thought it was chromed with shadows, THEN I realized that was painted...
ReplyDeleteIf its possession by a mere commoner makes Ted Kennedy sad, I'm OK with it.
ReplyDeleteI don't know--maybe it's for carry at Sea World.
ReplyDeleteAntibubba
Looks like candy!
ReplyDeleteThose pellets in its hide will teach it to go messin' around the farmer's sheep again.
ReplyDelete-Sans Authoritas
Honestly, it looks like one of "TJ's" creations . . . . so if it's ugly, at least the owner can console himself that he spent a lot of money to get it that way.
ReplyDelete:)