Heller v. District of Columbia
"What is reasonable about a total ban on possession?" Chief Justice John Roberts
Today's arguments of Heller v. District of Columbia, pdf file.
Labels: Heller v. District of Columbia
A Nurse with a Gun
Labels: Heller v. District of Columbia
posted by Xavier at 7:56 PM
Xavier is a Registered Nurse who specialized in complex wound care. He has practiced for over fourteen years in his community. He often provided nursing service in areas where law enforcement refused to enter without back-up. Xavier now works in surgery. Xavier has been an avid shooter for over 30 years. He strongly supports the 2nd Amendment, opposes gun control of any sort, and carries a weapon 24 hours a day. Xavier is known on various internet gun forums as XavierBreath. He is married with three children, and is moderated by an apathetic one eyed cat, a goofy Golden Retriever, and a stalwart German Shepherd Dog. One day, he hopes to be deserving of them all.
Domari Nolo
Xavier can still be emailed at
treatmewithbenignneglect@gmail.com
He might read your email.
He might delete it on sight.
He might publish it and comment on it.
The Four Rules
1. All firearms are always loaded
2. Never let the muzzle of a firearm point at anything you are not willing to destroy
3. Keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to shoot
4. Be sure of your target and what lies beyond it
The Five Rules of Concealed Carry
1. Your concealed handgun is for protection of life only.
2. Know exactly when you can use your gun.
3. If you can run away -- RUN!
4. Display your gun, be prepared to go to jail.
5. Don't let your emotions get the best of you.
6 Comments:
amazing.
Justice Scalia - "But why isn't it perfectly plausible, indeed reasonable, to assume that since the framers knew that the way militias were destroyed by tyrants in the past was not by passing a law against militias, but by taking away the people's weapons -- that was the way militias were destroyed."
Tyrants destroy militias by taking their weapons. We can't let that happen. Thanks Xavier, I don't know how you found that but I'm glad it's there for us to keep an eye on.
-Dan
Thanks for the link to the PDF, Xavier. As a law school student about to begin a competition in appellate oral arguments, reading the report was fascinating but frightening at the same time - I would hate to be representing anyone in front of the Supreme Court.
Let's hope the court gets this one right.
You can also hear an audio recording of the arguments at http://www.c-span.org/. It lasts over an hour and a half and gives a better flavor of what happened than the transcript.
A New York Times article says the court is likely to affirm an individual right to keep and bear arms. Don't hold your breath though. Their ruling is not expected until June I believe.
I think Police Chief Lanier summed up the District's definition of "reasonable" quite nicely.
Quick question. Who provided guns to the militia? If citizens provided their own guns when they joined the militia... wait a minute. I thought citizens weren't allowed to have guns?
It's insanity to even be debating this. It's common sense regarding the right to bear arms, but some would rather aspire to lunacy.
Post a Comment
<< Home