More on Jerome Ersland
The victim tells his side of the story.
One thing is certain. Antwun "Speedy” Parker would be alive today if he had stayed at home playing with his X-Box. He's dead because he decided to rob a pharmacy.
Labels: Jerome Ersland
A Nurse with a Gun
Labels: Jerome Ersland
posted by Xavier at 7:07 PM
Xavier is a Registered Nurse who specialized in complex wound care. He has practiced for over fourteen years in his community. He often provided nursing service in areas where law enforcement refused to enter without back-up. Xavier now works in surgery. Xavier has been an avid shooter for over 30 years. He strongly supports the 2nd Amendment, opposes gun control of any sort, and carries a weapon 24 hours a day. Xavier is known on various internet gun forums as XavierBreath. He is married with three children, and is moderated by an apathetic one eyed cat, a goofy Golden Retriever, and a stalwart German Shepherd Dog. One day, he hopes to be deserving of them all.
Domari Nolo
Xavier can still be emailed at
treatmewithbenignneglect@gmail.com
He might read your email.
He might delete it on sight.
He might publish it and comment on it.
The Four Rules
1. All firearms are always loaded
2. Never let the muzzle of a firearm point at anything you are not willing to destroy
3. Keep your finger off the trigger until you are ready to shoot
4. Be sure of your target and what lies beyond it
The Five Rules of Concealed Carry
1. Your concealed handgun is for protection of life only.
2. Know exactly when you can use your gun.
3. If you can run away -- RUN!
4. Display your gun, be prepared to go to jail.
5. Don't let your emotions get the best of you.
4 Comments:
There is no way he was surprised by this man. His back was turned when he went to get the gun, and he went up in one fluid motion and shot the guy 5 more times, then turned his back instantly, and walked back.
Does anyone know a reason why this bloke is wearing his brace outside his shirt, as opposed to inside? It doesn't look that difficult to cover.
I certainly wouldn't convict him of first degree murder, but he crossed a very plain line, no matter how distraught and hopped up on adrenaline he was.
-Sans Authoritas
S.A.-
It is so *wonderful* that you know exactly how Ersland was supposed to react, and can point out to everyone that the deviation proves him guilty! Thank Goodness!
I would *hate* for anyone to give him an opportunity to explain his state of mind and reasoning for the other shots.
It isn't as if there was *any* possibility that the young robber was getting up to continue the assault, and Ersland shot until the threat was gone, and then exited the store to verify if any more threats remained!
Thank goodness it has been explained away by you! Such a helpful Bloke you are!
-W
Because he shot a criminal, he should not be convicted. Those other criminals will be out on the street shortly.
The big question: why did he not shoot the kid holding the gun.
I'd have to sit through the whole trial to be sure, but I doubt I could vote to convict for anything more that 5 negligent discharges within city limits.
Had he had an unlimited amount of time to evaluate the deadly threats he was facing, hie might have chosen differently, but that option was never given to him.
I'd even hang the jury if I had to - although with people like me, they try very hard to keep out of the jury box in the first place.
Post a Comment
<< Home