Preferences
I own an H&K USP .45 ACP and I have been wondering for a long time now... Why do people prefer the 1911 over all other .45 ACP.I own two HK USPs, and quite a few 1911s. I chose to carry the 1911s and relegate the USPs to the safe and range gun status.
The USP is a good reliable gun with a trigger that pretty much ruins the package.
![Click to enlarge](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEi-eodzsqxLPw2ViUnhDj4fql2JZiC3wtH_acy94PAdocDoRdiz8WPei0krlHOdHTcjaXA_npZhVGuLOZLg1mZSaIgZk7ZC1_HR71MAdmUeapIhqu7gP3s6tyqCh8kWzFB_sIbv/s320/HKUSPssmallfile.jpg)
Remember that a 1911 is a style of pistol, not a specific gun. A more valid comparison would be between a specific 1911 and a HK product of equal market value. Saying "1911" is lumping Ed Brown's product in with stuff from tropical islands in the west Pacific. It's like putting HK's in the same category as S&W Sigmas and KelTec pistols.
Let's compare the HK USP (either compact or full size) to a Colt 1911 such as the Colt Series 70, the Colt New Agent, or even the Colt NRM Series 80 1911. That's a fair comparison. The Colt product is reliable, accurate, and has a great trigger that can easily be altered to fit the shooter's desires if needed.
![Click to enlarge](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEiULyQFnQYSbsf-PPdQXH44DZNAEkVOqkIZ-QgrMTMd8Shpb3xNVOpN2FIYpswoqXzevlEMIXP3n5jiphGFs0QELJ0mxiRdtD0Vd1OskzrmIeDH2a0k8A_t4Fmynyimj1SQynOQAA/s320/Lightweight1911s.jpg)
The Colt 1911 is accurate. It puts holes exactly where I want them to go, consistently hitting paper plates while I am on the move. The HK product, again with the exception of the P7 series, does not do that for me. I suppose you could say that I just have to learn to manage the HK USP trigger. Well, I shoot double action revolvers very well, in double action. Between the ergonomics and the trigger of the HK USP and it's more recent sibling, the P whatever it is called, I do not have the same accuracy under the same conditions. I'm just not willing to devote any more range time learning to accurately manage a trigger that is poor to mediocre from the start just so I can defend myself with the latest flavor of Kool-Aid. I would rather pick a pistol I shoot better with from the start and concentrate on training and tactics. Training and tactics keep you alive in a shooting. The latest Kool-Aid gives you bragging rights at the gun counter. I'd rather live through a shooting, assuming I can't avoid it from the start. That's why I carry a gun. When you think about it, that is the entire purpose of a handgun, to give it's owner a portable life saving device. If he can not carry it concealed and use it effectively, it fails in that role for him. Period.
I carry a gun and train to employ tactics with effective shooting to help me survive a threat to my life. Everything else is secondary to that.
![Click to enlarge](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgdvBqY2dns67eOtQiULrYUdZ4rW5sSRq36iMHVG-1JTDKuLW6doD8crs6tsuDJOu28FJF9hzdrN_AfWu8B4jA-5XOVIv-cRx1koxdz_aZy9FgOqyJEfyzJbB5T0lmddVbg8KxXfw/s320/ColtNewAgentandColtCompactcomparison.jpg)
Over time, that happens to every shooter. We find our personal favorite. Some would point out that the HK USP has greater capacity. I say my spare magazines help balance my entire carry package on my body. Some folks figure they need those extra bullets in the coming zombie apocalypse. I figure seven rounds +1 will get me out of a mugging or a liquor store robbery if I apply training and tactics well. If I need more ammunition, I have a spare magazine to cram into the gun while I am hunkering behind cover. I will be hunkering and exiting Dodge because I concentrated on learning tactics, not trends.
So that's why I prefer a 1911. After years of packing something else, after going through the wondernine revolution and considering the old GI gun to be an old man's gun, I realized that the 1911 and proper training and tactics was what I was looking for. That's why I carry a 1911. It works for me.
Labels: 1911's, CCW, Heckler and Koch
13 Comments:
Some of it depends on your use, too. If I were a cop, I might like the USP for being DA/SA and for having a larger magazine. I think they're more intimidating, too: the 1911 is just a little too sexy (heaven help anyone using a Hi Power on that front!). The USP is probably lighter, too, which must be nice on a duty belt.
(Yes, I have both a USP Compact in 9mm and a Springfield Mil-Spec 1911)
The USP is a good reliable gun with a trigger that pretty much ruins the package.
Truer words were never spoken about this particular firearm.
I remember picking up the USPc at the shop for the first time. The grip slid into my hand and fit it like a glove. All the controls were in the exact right spot. I didn't immediately love the magazine release, but felt I could get used to it.
And then, after asking permission, I tested the trigger. And all of a sudden the love affair was over. Maybe it's possible to do some kind of work to it to make it less gritty, but with many better triggers out there and a small budget, it dropped off my list.
That said, it's not a bad trigger, and to each his own. It's definitely serviceable and certainly more than good enough, The pistol's numerous other advantages could easily outweigh the shortcomings in this area, and it is certainly a fine firearm which, once I have a bit more in the bank account could well find a place in the collection. It just didn't fit the bill for me right now.
I have many years of 1911 experience most of it in the Marine Corps and have used them through thick and thin. I'm very enamored these days of the Hk 45 and P30. The P30 carries well and I feel quite snug with 15 rounds of 124gr +P Gold Dots. I have no issues with its trigger and love the Hk 45 trigger which is Hk's match trigger. i carry the HK 45 locked and cocked in single action mode. Light, easy maintenance, far fewer points of failure than a 1911 and shoots like a laser beam.
Weems to me, if you want a coolish gun with a poor trigger, you could get a CZ-100 and save a lot of money over the HundK.
I grew up shooting the 1911. The first pistol I bought (with my own money) was, however, a BHP. I did have a difficult time deciding between it and a Colt 1911, though.
I've had plenty of opportunities to shoot HK's which belonged to friends and acquaintances. Every time I come away smiling outwardly and giving them compliments on their choice of sidearms, mostly because I consider myself a gentleman and one never disses a man's woman, dog or firearm. On the inside, I'm incredulous that they paid *that much* for such an unwieldy crunchenticker.
But hey, don't pay any attention to me. The wife carries a Springer Micro Compact. My personal choice in .45 is a P220, which sort of rolls gently with recoil and doesn't move much in the hand at all. I'd like to think that JMB would nod approvingly.
Still got that old BHP, too.
Regards,
Rabbit.
why not a more contemporary comparison. The HK45 and the HK45c are more appropriate to compare against a 1911. Not to mention lowered bore axis, and more user friendly grip...
Xavier,
It seems to me that you have clearly enumerated why the HK should NOT be in YOUR safe. So, why is it? Sounds to me like trading fodder.
"why not a more contemporary comparison. The HK45 and the HK45c are more appropriate to compare against a 1911. Not to mention lowered bore axis, and more user friendly grip..."
I haven't shot those. If you are close by, I'll be willing to though.....
Will, when the right gun comes along and I need trade fodder, I suspect they will go.
Xav,
You will appreciate that William S. Halsted said that a good surgeon good get a better result with black silk than a poor surgeon could with gut.
Well thought out comments.
"After years of packing something else, after going through the wondernine revolution and considering the old GI gun to be an old man's gun, I realized that the 1911 and proper training and tactics was what I was looking for. That's why I carry a 1911. It works for me"
Hey - that's my line, too!
My friends USP40 almost made me buy one. Now I'm tempted to buy a USP45. However, like yourself, I love the 1911 format and I carry my commander exclusively.
Thank you so much for the artical!
I've done a lot of thinking about the new line of HK's since they came out and you basicaly read my mind.
I think my biggest beef is the price tag and B.S. hype behind a mediocre performing gun, I don't care how high quality a gun's manufacturing is, if it doesn't perform at the same level it's useless.
A rediculas trigger & brick ergonomics doesn't scream "go to gun" to me.
Xavier; you nailed it, exactly my thoughts on the subject as well, kudos to you!
Post a Comment
<< Home